Thelema Lodge
Ordo Templi Orientis
P.O.Box 2303
Berkeley, CA 94702 USA
January 1998 e.v. at Thelema Lodge
Announcements from
Lodge Members and Officers
A
reading list of "suggestive
materials" is a book with a seemingly familiar title. But James Grant's The Adventures of Rob Roy (1864) is different from the well-known novel Rob Roy
(1818) by Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832), despite the fact that another Scott
novel, Redgauntlet (1824), confusingly appears on the list immediately
preceding this entry. Walter Scott, who made such a great success with his
invention of the historical novel in the "Waverley" series of heroic stories
from the British past, remained enormously popular throughout the nineteenth
century. In his wake, especially in the many periodical magazines in which
most Victorian fiction originally appeared, there was a huge publishing market
for historically instructive adventure romances. The Scottish writer James
Grant (1822-1887), who knew how to spice his storytelling with Gaelic phrases
and tales from folklore, and to provide a maximum of violence and excitement
for his (presumably young) readers, has nearly faded from the reference books
by now. Publishers in his own time considered him a significant and
substantial novelist, and over a long mid-Victorian career Grant produced
dozens of "knock-off" books inspired by Sir Walter Scott, for readers who
somehow couldn't seem to get enough of these tales.
A
list partially out
of spite, because Mathers had obviously studied the book, and may even have
derived a substantial portion of his personal mythology from it. Edward
Alexander Crowley had also changed his name as a teenager, however, and the
unusual spelling of his adopted forename likewise figures prominently in
Grant's book. Like Mathers and many others, Aleister Crowley was an
Englishman unable to resist the "Celtic Revival" styles of the late nineteenth
century, and he enjoyed representing himself at various times as Irish or
Scottish.

The Vanity Fair Haiku Contest
[Aleister Crowley]
I. |
The Hokku - A New Verse Form
And a Prize Contest
for Ambitious American Poets
by Kwaw Li Ya
of the University of Pekin
God in an atom!
Comets revel around him -
That is a hokku!
The Prize Winners of the Hokku Contest
Their Poetry and an Analysis of It
by the Eminent Chinese Poet
Kwaw Li Ya
Most Charming Mr Editor:
Oh how bitter
Is the White Poppy Death;
There are no more dreams of love.
The pale moth
Trembles with the white moonlight;
Thus my heart trembles with love.
The Hokku Winners
A Few Comments by the Judge of the Contest
by Kwaw Li Ya


1003 = address of Agape Lodge at the time
Roy = Roy Leffingwell.
K.J. = Karl J. Germer
Max = Max Schneider
Jack = Jack Parsons
Jane = Jane Wolfe
132 = W.T.Smith
Jean = Jean Schneider, later Schivonen.
| COPY. Extracts from letter Roy to K.J. Sept. 8, 1943.
"Now as to 1003. I wanted to attend the 'Important meeting'. Both Jack and Max for diametrically opposed reasons asked me to attend. ... (He could not do it.) Hence I am writing in complete ignorance of the result of the meeting, and you must bear this in mind in reading the following comments on that situation. I don't believe that Max, Jack and Jane will ever come to a meeting of minds on 1003, nor do I believe that it is possible for Jane and Jack to wholly ever accept Max either as a resident there nor as an adviser. To me, an impartial observer, on the ground, the reason is clear. Jane and Jack suspect Max's motives - Max suspects their associations and their viewpoint on 132. Neither has convinced the other, .... of their sincerity so long as Jane and Jack look upon Max as an interloper and a spy, and Max looks upon them as secretly holding forth with 132. Seeing so little of them, I am not competent to judge who may be in the right. I do agree with A.C. in his last letter to ... that when Max departs from a strictly judicial attitude, he allows his personal feelings to sway both his judgment and reports. And, I agree with Max that there is still the old pseudo-Bohemian, doubtful and indecorous social atmosphere so reminiscent of the Smith regime. I went to 1003 Friday last week. Max wasn't there and I spent the whole evening with Jane and Jack. They gave me their views and complaints in full. Saturday afternoon Max and Jean came out and stayed over labor day. Max showed me all the correspondence between A.C., you and himself, and told me all his views. After listening to all of them, you and you alone have my heartfelt sympathy in the matter. I could be no more wearisome as I see it if you were handling a bunch of little children. ... I wonder if it is all worth while. About a year ago I wrote you that I had passed 1003, that it appeared 'quite pretentious - too pretentious, I am afraid for permanency.'. It now appears that I was right. Jack complains that it costs him about $300 a month, that he could get along in a much cheaper place and send more to A.C. if he gave it up - and that unless he got more material cooperation from members, and unless he were allowed to run things himself, he would give it up. As I understand it that was to be the purpose of the meeting last night - to give all members an opportunity to express themselves and determine future plans. Frankly, I can't say that I blame Jack, Karl. He understands and appreciates his lack of experience and development. He is, I feel, sincere and earnest in his desire to further the Law and the Work. He is carrying out of his own pocket an establishment ten times too large for him for a bunch of unco- oprative 'good time Charlies' who will drink all he'll buy for them, attend 'parties' regularly, and leave him holding the sack for expenses. Of what value is that material, and that establishment, and that program to the Order? Of what value are initiations that fail to initiate, because there is no dignity, no power, no solemnity worthy of the rituals in their presentation (read from typed script by the officers officiating!) Of what value a huge establishment that can be only half kept up on $300 a month, with that sum dependent on one man? Of what value the petty bickerings, and spites, and jealousies eternally current with each writing his little grievances to you or to A.C. as though THE ORDER were 1003, and Jack and Agape? |

| I am a Centurion | |
| of the Legions of Freedom | |
| all men are my comrades | |
| all nations my brothers | |
| all life is a boon | |
| of the Goddess Our Mother | |
| at our term we return | |
| to Our Maid of the Star Drifts. | |
| there is no dread hereafter | |
| there is dissolution of the body | |
| and eternal ecstasy in the kisses of Our Goddess | |
| there is death for the dogs | |
| of Sensate and Reason | |
| there is no bond that can unite the divided but love | |
| all else is a curse | |
| there is no higher rank | |
| than Centurion of the Legions! | |
| there is no higher honor | |
| than Legionnaire of the Legions! | |
| ave The Centurion! | |
| ave Our Starborne Goddess Mother! | |
| ave The Legions! | |
Derived from a lecture series in 1977 e.v. by Bill Heidrick
Copyright © Bill Heidrick
We add sixteen more, using up all the possibilities of connect-the-dots between the Sephirot that are not used by the twenty-two paths for the
twenty-two Hebrew letters. Four of the new paths come out of Keter; to
Chesed, Geburah, Netzach and Hod. Four come out of Chokmah; to Geburah, Hod,
Yesod and Malkut. Four join Binah with Chesed, Netzach, Yesod and Malkut.
Two new ones come out of Chesed to connect with Yesod and Malkut, with another
two coming out the same way from Geburah. David Hulse turned me on to this
diagram some years ago, based on a remark made by Jason Lauterhand.
The paths coming out of Keter suit my notion of the Knights in traditional
Tarot. They act like messengers of the deity, riding forth to take charge at
distant points around Tipheret like manning watchtowers about the city. Keter
to Chesed would probably be the Knight of Wands. The Knight of Cups rides
down from the Crown to Geborah. The Knight of Swords and the Knight of Coins
ward Netzach and Hod, each aiding the balance by adding a little of the
quality opposite to the Sephira.
We will come back to these sixteen paths when we take up human psychology
on the Tree; but for now, experiment with them. Unlike the traditional
twenty-two, there aren't many correspondences to "help". Working out meanings
for these hidden paths is a good exercise in thinking of the paths as simple
connections or transitions between the Sephirot. That's closer to their
nature and much better than over-defined attempts to memorize every little
table in Liber 777. Those columns in 777 all have meaning, but you can't get meaning by rote.

D
Shin of Shin ritual. He was successful by a
personal adaptation of the Enochian Calls, after failing through too close a
following of procedure laid out by others. Try the method of the 8th Aethyr,
but be ready to learn something unique to yourself if that doesn't pan out.
| 1/4/98 | Gnostic Mass 7:30PM Horus Temple | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/7/98 | College of Hard NOX 8 PM with Mordecai in the library | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/10/98 | OTO Initiations, call to attend | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/11/98 | Lodge luncheon meeting 12:30 | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/11/98 | Gnostic Mass 7:30PM Horus Temple | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/18/98 | Gnostic Mass 7:30PM Horus Temple | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/19/98 | Section II reading group with Caitlin: James Grant's "Rob Roy" at Oz house, 8 PM | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/25/98 | Gnostic Mass 7:30PM Horus Temple | Thelema Ldg. | ||
| 1/26/98 | Sirius Oasis meeting 8:00 PM in Berkeley | Sirius Oasis | ||
| 1/28/98 | College of Hard NOX 8 PM with Mordecai in the library | Thelema Ldg. |
Thelema Lodge
Ordo Templi Orientis
P.O. Box 2303
Berkeley, CA 94702 USA
Phone: (510) 652-3171 (for events info and contact to Lodge)
Production and Circulation:
OTO-TLC
P.O.Box 430
Fairfax, CA 94978 USA
Internet: heidrick@well.com (Submissions and circulation only)